The Fundamental Difference Between Metaphor and Symbol
An explanation of the subtle difference between metaphor and symbol; a metaphor is based on observation, whereas a symbol expresses profound knowledge and a multiplicity of meaning.
Added to your favorites
An explanation of the subtle difference between metaphor and symbol; a metaphor is based on observation, whereas a symbol expresses profound knowledge and a multiplicity of meaning.
When does the repetition of words in poetry become a symbol, and when is it merely a reflection of a poet's weak creative power and habit?
Akbar Allahabadi is the only Urdu poet who treated modern Western inventions like the train, engine, and cannon not merely as objects, but as symbols of colonial power and cultural dominance.
An analysis and understanding of the fundamental elements of creative language, simile, metaphor, and imagery, in the light of Shamsur Rahman Faruqi's critical insights.
The idea that true poetry is the poet's autobiography has been prevalent in Urdu criticism. This article examines the flaws of this theory and its negative impact on the classical ghazal.
This article highlights how the proposal to change the Urdu script to Roman or Devanagari is tantamount to destroying the Urdu language and its centuries-old literary heritage.
This article analyzes the phonological rhythm in Allama Iqbal's poetry, specifically focusing on the abundant use of sibilant and continuant sounds and the atmosphere they create.
This article explores how Allama Iqbal minimized the use of heavy aspirated and retroflex sounds in his Urdu poetry, and examines the profound impact this had on his poetic style.
A critical and historical analysis of the famous anecdote recorded in Maulana Hali's 'Yadgar-e-Ghalib', exploring whether Mir Taqi Mir truly predicted the eleven-year-old Ghalib's rise to greatness after hearing his couplets.
In Hindi rhetoric (Alankar), human emotions and feelings are divided into nine (9) categories, which Allama Shibli considers more scientific compared to Arabic and Persian traditions.
Allama Shibli Nomani has highlighted the elegance and delicacy of thought in Hindi poetry by comparing the rhetorical figures (Alankar) of Braj Bhasha with those of Arabic and Persian.
In the ghazal, the specific themes of poets (such as Ghalib's jealousy or Mir's self-respect) are not their personal traits but rather a part of artistic thematic invention.
A critical review of the masnavi 'Padmavat' by Malik Muhammad Jayasi, the great poet of the Sher Shah era, who surpassed even Hindu poets in his use of the pure Bhasha language.
The original name of the Urdu language was 'Hindi', which the British, under their 'divide and rule' policy, renamed as 'Urdu' or the 'language of the camp'.
The most crucial requirement of a ghazal is the economical use of words. Unnecessary words (Hashv) and the inability to fully articulate a thought (Ijz-e-Nazm) destroy the beauty of a couplet.
This article examines the centuries-old debate between literature and history, highlighting the conflict between Plato's theory of mimesis and Aristotle's formalism, and its impact on Urdu literature.
How Amir Khusro, the Sufi mystics, and the saints of the Bhakti movement made the shared language of Urdu and Hindi a medium to reach the hearts of the people.
Despite their intellectual similarities, Mir's poetry resembles a vast, bustling city, whereas Ghalib's work is like an elaborate, enchanted drawing room.
Shamsur Rahman Faruqi strongly refutes critics who view Mir's ghazals as a direct reflection of his autobiography or the social conditions of the eighteenth century.
An explanation of the subtle difference between metaphor and symbol; a metaphor is based on observation, whereas a symbol expresses profound knowledge and a multiplicity of meaning.
Subscribe to Rekhta Newsletter to get all the latest updates